Sustainable Consumption Behaviour and Common Goods: Education, Culture, Rule of Law, Work, and Solidarity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2024.03.25.10Keywords:
Sustainable consumption, common goods, sustainability, education for sustainability, sustainable behaviourAbstract
It is increasingly imperative to foster consumption behaviours that are more environmentally responsible. In order to design impact and sustainable actions that promote a transition to a more sustainable society, it is crucial to understand the underlying motivators that drive this change. Within this framework, this study sought to demonstrate how the comprehensive experience of common goods (solidarity, work, rule of law, culture, and education) is linked to such consumption behaviours. In order to test this hypothesis, a hypothetical-deductive quantitative approach was utilised, employing the second-generation statistical technique of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) for data analysis. The results revealed that only the common good of Solidarity exhibits a significant relationship with Sustainable Consumption Behaviour. Additionally, Work and Education as common goods demonstrate a relationship of relative importance with this behaviour. Additionally, relationships were found between the common good, showcasing the interconnectedness rooted in cultural norms that strengthen individuals' experiences and, thus, cultivate a sense of community - an essential component for promoting consciousness and modifying behaviours. The novelty of this work is that it was not only focused on governing the commons, but also on how they are distributed and maintained for the long term. The theoretical basis was that natural resources are finite goods to which everyone should have access; however, not everyone enjoys them. That is why a limitation in agency impedes the experience of common goods and, therefore, in sustainable consumption. This study demonstrated that prioritising the welfare of others in addition to oneself, known as altruism, enhances the satisfaction derived from selfless consumption. The implications of this research include the development of instructional interventions incorporating motivational aspects to encourage sustainable consumption practices, ultimately supporting the shift necessary for the well-being of future generations.
References
Alejandro García, S. (2022). Educación ambiental para la sustentabilidad, una apuesta desde la pedagogía crítica y sentipensante [Environmental education for sustainability, a bet from critical and sentimental pedagogy]. Revista CoPaLa, 7(14), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.35600/25008870.2022.14.0214
Acuña-Moraga, O., Severino-González, P., Sarmiento-Peralta, G., & Stuardo-Solar, C. (2022). Consumo sustentable en Chile: Una aproximación a los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) [Sustainable consumption in Chile: An approach to sustainable development goals (SDGs)]. Información Tecnológica, 33(4), 181–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642022000400181
Blanco de Di Lascio, C. (2018). Cultura del cuidado y desafío institucional [Culture of care and institutional challenge]. In A.-V. M. Dolores (Ed.), La prosocialidad, cinco miradas latinoamericanas [Prosociality: Five Latin American perspectives] (pp. 29–51). México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Beretta, S., & Nebel, M. (2020). A special issue on common good. Introduction. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 128, 367–382. https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/179622
Campello, L. G., & Trindade, J. R. (2023). Sociedad posmoderna, consumo sostenible y Organización de las Naciones Unidas: la búsqueda incompleta de la solidaridad [Postmodern society, sustainable consumption, and the United Nations: The incomplete quest for solidarity]. Veredas do Direito, 20, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v20.2445-esp
Cantú-Martínez, P. C. (2020). Alteridad de la educación para impulsar y valorar la sustentabilidad [A shift in education to instill and value sustainability]. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 14(1), Article e1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2020.1023
Dowbor, L., Esteves Rodrigues, A., & Panez Pinto, A. (2018). Reapropiaciones de los bienes comunes: miradas críticas en torno a la gobernanza hídrica [Reappropriations of common goods: Critical perspectives on water governance]. Rupturas, 8(2), 33–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.22458/rr.v8i2.2112
Figueroa-García, E., Vizcaíno-Arredondo, J. M., & Hernández-Velázquez, K. M. (2023). Las estrategias de sustentabilidad de las empresas y su impacto en el comportamiento de consumo sustentable: un modelo PLS-SEM [Sustainability strategies of companies and their impact on sustainable consumption behavior: A PLS-SEM model]. In E. Larios-Gómez, L. Fischer de la Vega, & J. R. Vásquez-Sánchez (Eds.), Gestión de la Mercadotecnia Social desde un enfoque latinoamericano México-Colombia [Management of social marketing from a Latin American perspective: Mexico-Colombia focus] (pp. 3–22). México: Entelequia Editores.
Franco Crespo, A. A. (2017). Políticas públicas que modifican los hábitos de consumo como estrategia de protección medioambiental [Public policies modifying consumption habits as a strategy for environmental protection, Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. http://hdl.handle.net/10644/5579
Frémeaux, S., Grevin, A., y Sferrazzo, R. (2023). Developing a culture of solidarity through a three-step virtuous process: Lessons from common good- oriented organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 188, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05314-8
García-Machado, J. J., Figueroa-García, E. C., & Jachowicz, A. (2020). Sustainable consumption behaviour in Poland through a PLS-SEM Model. In W. Sroka (Ed.), Perspectives on consumer behaviour. Theoretical aspects and practical applications (pp. 147–171). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47380-8
Goldman, D., Hansmann, R., Činčera, J., Radović, V., Telešienė, A., Balžekienė, A., & Vávra, J. (2020). Education for environmental citizenship and responsible environmental behaviour. In A. C. Hadjichambis, P. Reis, D. Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, J. Činčera, J. Boeve-de Pauw, N. Gericke, & M.-C. Knippels (Eds.), Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education (pp. 115–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1_8
Guitián, G. (2020). Sobre la formulación del principio de solidaridad de la Doctrina Social de la Iglesia [On the formulation of the principle of solidarity in the Social Doctrine of the Church]. Teología y Vida, 61(1), 21–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0049-34492020000100021
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Castillo Apraiz, J., Cepeda Carrión, G., & Roldán, J. L. (2017). Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) [Manual of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)]. España: OmniaScience.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Castillo Apraiz, J., Cepeda Carrion, G. A., & Roldán, J. L. (2021). Manual avanzado de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) [Advanced manual of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)]. Madrid: OmniaScience.
Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., & Schuberth, F. (2020). Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research. Journal of Business Research, (120), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.026
Houtart, F. (2014). De los bienes comunes al bien común de la humanidad. El ágora USB, 14(1), 258–293.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, (2021, September 7). Anuario estadístico y geográfico por Entidad Federativa 2020 [Statistical and geographical yearbook by Federal Entity 2020]. Obtenido de INEGI: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/702825197513.pdf
Javier, L., Yuli, R., & Obregón, A. (2022). Desastres naturales: Intervención humana, racionalidad instrumental y educación para la sustentabilidad [Natural disasters: Human intervention, instrumental rationality and education for sustainability]. Revista de filosofía, 39, 629–641. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6465244
Jiménez-Domínguez, R. (2016). El decrecimiento como alternativa de sustentabilidad [Degrowth as a sustainability alternative]. In F. J. Aceves-Hernández (Ed.), Sustentabilidad. Decrecimiento, acciones, formación, salud [Sustainability. Degrowth, actions, education, health] (pp. 13–40). Ciudad de México: Ediciones Navarra.
Jiménez-Munive, J. M., Luna-Nemecio, J., & Jiménez-Munive, C. (2022). Empoderamiento social y organizacional como un modelo de investigación para alcanzar la sustentabilidad [Social and organizational empowerment as a research model to achieve sustainability]. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío, 34(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34n1.558
Kasparian, D., & Rebón, J. (2020). La sustentabilidad del cambio social. Factores positivos en la consolidación de las empresas recuperadas por sus trabajadores en la Argentina [The sustainability of social change. Positive factors in the consolidation of enterprises recuperated by their workers in Argentina]. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, (98), 213–246. http://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.98.13940
Kottow, M. (2022). Bien común, derechos humanos, bienes comunes [Common good, human rights, common goods]. Cuadernos Médico Sociales, 62(2), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.56116/cms.v62.n2.2022.183
Larkin, P. J. (2023). America’s two pastimes: Baseball and constitutional law. Catholic University Law Review, 72(4), 555–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4193135
Locatelli, R. (2018). La educación como bien público y común. Reformular la gobernanza de la educación en un contexto cambiante [Education as a public and common good. Rethinking educational governance in a changing context]. Perfiles Educativos, 40(162), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2018.162.59195
Maldonado, B., Rivas, L. A., Molina, D., y Flores, J. L. (2007). Análisis de los modelos de marketing ambiental [Analysis of environmental marketing models]. Universidad & Empresa, 6(12), 20–38. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=187217411003
Marín Ávila, E. (2019). Husserl y Villoro: reflexiones en torno a los bienes comunes, la sabiduría, la ciencia y el sentido de la filosofía para la vida [Husserl and Villoro: Reflections on common goods, wisdom, science, and the meaning of philosophy for life]. Diánoia, 64(82), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2019.82.1638
Martínez Ávila, M., & Fierro Moreno, E. (2018). Aplicación de la técnica PLS-SEM en la gestión del conocimiento: un enfoque técnico práctico [Application of PLS-SEM technique in knowledge management: A practical technical approach]. Revista iberoamericana para la investigación y el desarrollo educativo, 8(16), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.336
Mayorga Muñoz, C. J., & Treggiari, F. (2018). Bienes comunes y organización social: la experiencia actual de las comunidades mapuches en Chile [Common goods and social organization: The current experience of mapuche communities in Chile]. Revista de Derecho, (51), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.14482/dere.51.333.2
Mejia González, L., Cujia Berrío, S. E., & Liñan Cuello, Y. I. (2022). Políticas educativas en América Latina. Del modelo economicista a la educación para la sustentabilidad [Educational policies in latin america: From the economic model to education for sustainability]. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(100), 1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.100.13
Montañez Pico, D. (2020). Hacia un paradigma latinoamericano crítico de los bienes comunes [Towards a critical Latin American paradigm of common goods]. LIDER, 22(37), 44–62. http://doi.org/10.32735/S0719-5265202037175
Montaudon-Tomas, C. M., Gutiérrez-González, M. A., Pinto-López, I. N., & Malcón-Cervera, C. (2021). Identifying the theoretical foundations for common good leadership. Ethics, Economics and Common Goods, 2(18), 41–79. https://ethics-and-economics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Ethics-economics-and-common-goods.pdf
Nebel, M., & Arbesu-Verduzco, L. I. (2020). A metric of common goods dynamics. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, (4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.26350/000518_000055
Nebel, M., Garza-Vázquez, Ó., & Clemens, S. (Eds.). (2022). A common good approach to development: Collective dynamics of development processes. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0290
Oslington, P. (2023). Alasdair McIntyre and Adam Smith on markets, virtues and ends in a capitalist economy. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1126–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12560
Pascual Galafassi, G. (2018). Entre las clases y los movimientos sociales. Conflictos, acumulación y bienes comunes [Between classes and new social movements. An interpretation from the relationship between accumulation, commons and conflicts]. Athenea Digital, 18(2), Article e1757. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1757
Pascual i Ruiz, J. (2017). La cultura como un bien común de la ciudad. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. http://surl.li/rtjmk
Pascual i Ruiz, J. (2020). La cultura como un pilar del desarrollo sostenible: aportes a un debate ineludible [Culture as a pillar of sustainable development: contributions to an unavoidable debate]. Periférica internacional. Revista para el análisis de la cultura y el territorio, 21, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.25267/Periferica.2020.i21.11
Perelman, M. D. (2020). Para una antropología amplia del trabajo desde y en Argentina [Toward a comprehensive anthropology of work from and in Argentina]. In M. D. Perelman, H. M. Palermo, & M. L. Capogrossi (Eds.), Tratado Latinoamericano de antropología del trabajo [Latin American treaty of labor anthropology] (pp. 231–263). Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/194290
Poder Ejecutivo del Estado de Querétaro, (2021). Anuario económico 2021. Querétaro competitivo [Economic yearbook 2021: Competitive Querétaro]. Obtenido de Secretaría de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://sedesu2.queretaro.gob.mx/firma/AEE_2021_QUERETARO%20COMPETITIVO.pdf
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
Ritchey, F. J. (2008). Estadística para las ciencias sociales [Statistics for social sciences]. Colombia, Colombia: McGraw Hill.
Roldán de la Tejera, L. F., & Gutiérrez-González, M. A. (2023). El bien común en UPAEP: análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo [The common good in UPAEP: Quantitative and qualitative analysis]. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Educativos, 53(1), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.48102/rlee.2023.53.1.536
Suárez-Ruíz, E. J. (2019). Una crítica de la teoría de la propiedad derivada de la ‘tragedia de los bienes comunes’ a la luz de una perspectiva evolutiva [A critique of the theory of property derived from the “Tragedy of the Commons” in the light of an evolutionary perspective]. En-Clave del Pensamiento. Revista de Filosofía, Arte, Literatura, Historia, 13(26), 102–116. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1870-879X2019000200102&script=sci_arttext
United Nations, (n.d.). Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/
Van Quaquebeke, N., Salem, M., Van Dijke, M., & Wenzel, R. (2022). Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(3), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221097571
Velázquez-Castro, J. A.-C., Ramírez-Godínez, J., & Vargas-Martínez, E. E. (2020). Consumo sustentable en turismo: una aproximación a su estado del conocimiento [Sustainable tourism consumption: An approach to its state of knowledge]. AD-minister(37), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.37.3
Vélez-Vega, J. (2017). La gubernamentalidad sustentable: Para una crítica de nuestro tiempo [Sustainable governmentality: Towards a critique of our time]. In M. Ribeiro-Palacios & J. Vélez Vega (Eds.), Dibujando futuros posibles: Sustentabilidad y modos de vida [Drawing possible futures: Sustainability and ways of life] (pp. 21–50). México: Plaza y Valdés.
Ynoub, R. (2015). Revisión de algunos fundamentos lógico-metodológicos de la investigación cualitativa [Review of some logical-methodological foundations of qualitative research]. Perspectivas Metodológicas, 2(16), 11–34. https://revistas.unla.edu.ar/epistemologia/article/download/768/822
Zhao, A. L., Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2023). Cultivating sustainable consumption: The role of harmonious cultural values and pro-environmental self-identity. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 1014–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2261
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
