Practices in the Field of Disciplinary Liability of Convicts While Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment: Analysis of International Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2024.09.25.04Keywords:
Comparative penology, disciplinary offences of prisoners, disciplinary sanctions, international standards, “good practices”.Abstract
The article examines the issue of international experience of disciplinary liability of persons sentenced to imprisonment on the example of the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), the European Prison Rules and other international acts, and also examines the experience of individual countries. The purpose of the study is to identify the main standards and "good practices" of applying disciplinary sanctions to persons sentenced to imprisonment. The relevance of the study is stipulated by the need to implement international standards in the penitentiary system of Azerbaijan, taking into account the latest monitoring data on the practice of applying disciplinary sanctions to prisoners. This descriptive study used a method based on a qualitative analysis of scientific literature and legal regulations. The research examined international legal systems governing the disciplinary liability of convicted individuals serving sentences of imprisonment. The focus was on content analysis of publications containing legal norms, practical examples of their application, and the study of regulations from countries with different legal systems. Based on the results of the study, the author identified the main prohibited practices: corporal punishment, placement in an unlit cell, deprivation or restriction of food and drink, forced labour, collective punishment of prisoners, any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; and permitted practices: warnings, reprimands, telephone access, prohibition of short-term visits, prohibition of shopping, prohibition of receiving parcels and correspondence, solitary confinement or solitary confinement as a last resort. The author also emphasises the rights of prisoners to information on the rules of conduct in the penitentiary institution, to participate in a disciplinary hearing and to appeal against a decision to impose a disciplinary sanction, which constitutes the scientific novelty of the study and areas for further research.
References
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (2015). Guidelines on the conditions of arrest, police custody and pre-trial detention in Africa. https://achpr.au.int/index.php/en/node/853.
Astuti, N., & Barthos, M. (2022). Application of disciplinary punishment against prisoners who violate orders (Study at Class II A prisons in Bekasi). In F. J. Nugroho, E. E. Supriyanto, M. Rachmawati, H. Saksono, K. Kustiyono, & R. Rahim (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference (MIC 2021). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315764
Anderson, J., Pitner, R., & Wooten, N. (2019). A gender-specific model of trauma and victimisation in incarcerated women. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment 30(2), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1673272
Apel, A. B., & Diller, J. W. (2017). Prison as punishment: A behaviour-analytic evaluation of incarceration. The Behaviour Analyst, 40(1), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0081-6
Association for the Prevention of Torture. (n.d.). Disciplinary measures. https://www.apt.ch/knowledge-hub/dfd/disciplinary-measures.
Brangan, L. (2020). Exceptional states: The political geography of comparative penology. Punishment & Society, 22(5), 596-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520915995
Burchett, J. & Weyembergh, A. (2023). Prisons and detention conditions in the EU. European Union. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2023/741374/IPOL_STU(2023)741374_EN.pdf
Committee against Torture (2024). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Azerbaijan. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2FCAT%2FCOC%2FAZE%2F58382&Lang=en.
Council of Europe (2020). Recommendation Rec(2006)2-rev of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the European Prison Rules. https://search.coe.int/cm?i=09000016809ee581
Crewe, B. (2021). The depth of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 23(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520952153
Crewe, B., & Ievins, A. (2020). The prison as a reinventive institution. Theoretical Criminology, 24(4), 568-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619841900
Crewe, B., Ievins, A., Larmour, S., Laursen, J., Mjåland, K., & Schliehe, A. (2023). Nordic penal exceptionalism: A comparative, empirical analysis. The British Journal of Criminology, 63(2), 424-443. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac013.
Crewe, B., Liebling, A., & Hulley, S. (2018). Staff-prisoner relationships, staff professionalism, and the use of authority in public- and private-sector prisons. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(2), 309-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12093
Demianchuk, T., Kozych, I., Medytskyi, I., Bilousov, Y., & Zhukov, I. (2023). International standards for the treatment of prisoners in the penal system. Lex Humana, 15(3), 325-343. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2612.
DeVeaux, M. I. (2013). The trauma of the incarceration experience. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 48, 257-277. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287267277_The_Trauma_of_the_Incarceration_Experience.
Duwe, G. (2017). The use and impact of correctional programming for inmates on pre- and post-release outcomes. Minnesota Department of Corrections. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/250476.pdf.
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (2023). 33rd general report: Activities 2023. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680af71cd
Fahy, M. (2022). The model institutional record expungement act (MIREA): A model regulation for expunging prison disciplinary records (Ohio State legal studies research paper No. 731). Drug Enforcement and Policy Centre. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221131
Grujic, Z., & Milić, I. (2021). Disciplinary punishment of convicted persons - concurrence of national and international normative standards. Archibald Reiss Days, 11, 81-91. https://eskup.kpu.edu.rs/dar/article/view/286.
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2008). Principles and best practices on the protection of persons deprived of their liberty in the Americas (Resolution 1/08). https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/iachr/2008/en/59705.
Jewkes, Y., Jordan, M., Wright, S., & Bendelow, G. (2019). Designing 'healthy' prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice (TICP) into prison planning and design. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), Article 3818. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203818
Kelman, J., Gribble, R., Harvey, J., Palmer, L., & MacManus, D. (2022). How does a history of trauma affect the experience of imprisonment for individuals in women's prisons: A qualitative exploration. Women & Criminal Justice, 34(3), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2022.2071376
Labrecque, R. M., Mears, D. P., & Smith, P. (2020). Gender and the effect of disciplinary segregation on prison misconduct. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(8), 1193-1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419884728
McKendy, L., & Ricciardelli, R. (2021). The pains of imprisonment and contemporary prisoner culture in Canada. The Prison Journal, 101(5), 528-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211048166
Midtlyng, G. (2022). Safety rules in a Norwegian high-security prison: The impact of social interaction between prisoners and officers. Safety Science, 149, Article 105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105690
Miravalle, M. (2016). Detention and its effects on prisoners: An overview of the typologies and status quo in various member states. In The impact of detention on prisoners. ERA. https://www.era-comm.eu/detention_3/kiosk/pdf/s_c_316DT69.pdf.
Mjåland, K., Laursen, J., Schliehe, A., & Larmour, S. (2023). Contrasts in freedom: Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway. European Journal of Criminology, 20(5), 1641-1662. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211065905
Murdoch, J., & Jiricka, V. (2016). Combating ill-treatment in prison: A handbook for prison staff with focus on the prevention of ill-treatment in prison. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/combating-ill-treatment-in-prison-2-web-en/16806ab9a7.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights UN Information Service (2024, April 24). In dialogue with Azerbaijan, experts of the committee against torture welcome human rights training for state officials, ask about reported widespread torture and ill-treatment in detention and efforts to improve prison conditions. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/news/2024/04/examen-de-lazerbaidjan-au-comite-contre-la-torture-les-allegations-associees-au
Pakes, F. (2020). Old-fashioned Nordic penal exceptionalism: The case of Iceland's open prisons. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 21(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2020.1809199
Prais, V. (2021). The implementation in Canada of the un standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners: A practitioner's perspective. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(3), 730-767. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab001.
Public Defender of Georgia (2019). The practice of disciplinary proceedings against prisoners in Georgia. https://www.ombudsman.ge/res/docs/2019110509560262585.pdf
Public Defender of Georgia. (2021, November 19). Prisoners win disputes over disciplinary action with help from public defender's office and GYLA. https://www.ombudsman.ge/eng/190411044320siakhleebi/sakhalkho-damtsvelis-aparatisa-da-saias-dakhmarebit-patimrebma-distsiplinuri-pasukhismgeblobis-dakisrebis-shesakheb-davebi-moiges
Reiter, K., Sexton, L., & Sumner, J. (2018). Theoretical and empirical limits of Scandinavian Exceptionalism: Isolation and normalisation in Danish prisons. Punishment & Society, 20(1), 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517737273
Rogers, C., Jordaan, J., & Esterhuyse, K. (2022). Coping, aggression, perceived social support and demographic variables as predictors of prison adjustment among male incarcerated offenders. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 24(2), 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221106610
Schliehe, A., Laursen, J., & Crewe, B. (2022). Loneliness in prison. European Journal of Criminology, 19(6), 1595-1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820988836
Strzelecki, J. (2019). Russia behind bars: The peculiarities of the Russian prison system. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2019-02-07/russia-behind-bars-peculiarities-russian-prison-system.
Toman, E. L. (2022). Disciplinary confinement and misconduct patterns: An examination of gendered effects. Crime & Delinquency, 68(6-7), 945-974. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211010484
UN General Assembly. (1988). Body of principles for the protection of all persons under any form of detention or imprisonment (Resolution 43/173). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/body-principles-protection-all-persons-under-any-form-detention
UN General Assembly. (1990). United Nations rules for the protection of juveniles deprived of their liberty (Resolution 45/113). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-rules-protection-juveniles-deprived-their-liberty
UN General Assembly. (2010). United Nations rules for the treatment of women prisoners and non-custodial measures for women offenders (the Bangkok Rules). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-rules-treatment-women-prisoners-and-non-custodial
UN General Assembly. (2015). United Nations standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners (The Nelson Mandela rules) (A/RES/70/175). https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n15/443/41/pdf/n1544341.pdf?token=YbcpPibGVmkyrFDTGC&fe=true
Urbanek, A. (2020). Reactions of prison staff to the needs of culturally different convicts. Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10010001
US Embassy in Baku. (2022, April 13). 2021 Country reports on human rights practices: Azerbaijan. https://az.usembassy.gov/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices-azerbaijan/.
Wildeman, C., & Andersen, L. H. (2020). Long-term consequences of being placed in disciplinary segregation. Criminology, 58(3), 423-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12241
Zeng, Y., Zhang, Q., Yan, J., Qi, K., Ma, A., Liu, X., & Xiao, J. (2024). The relationship between nature exposure and depression among Chinese prisoners: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1252864. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252864
Zhanozakova, L. T., Suleimanov, A. F., Amirov, N. K., Bekbaeva, A., & Urbisinova, N. (2024). Rights of prisoners in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Legislation and practice of its implementation. Kurdish Studies, 12(1), 4526-4539. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i1.326
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
